Cate Blanchett-Backed Group and Collection of Hollywood Stars File Brief in New York Times-OpenAI Lawsuit: Hollywood Has ‘Proven Infrastructure’ to License Content

The Human Consent Foundation, backed by Cate Blanchett, and a slew of Hollywood stars and companies have thrown their weight behind the New York Times in its lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. This development is significant because it highlights the growing concern among creatives and rights holders about the unauthorized use of their content to train AI models. The fact that a prominent nonprofit and a collection of Hollywood heavyweights are rallying behind the Times suggests that this is a high-stakes battle with far-reaching implications for the entertainment industry.

The crux of the argument made by the Human Consent Foundation and its allies is that the entertainment industry has a "proven infrastructure" in place to license content, implying that OpenAI and Microsoft should have sought permission and paid royalties for using copyrighted material to train their AI models. This raises important questions about the responsibilities of AI developers and the need for clearer guidelines on content usage. As AI technology continues to advance and become more pervasive, the industry is watching closely to see how this case will set a precedent for future disputes.

What's next to watch is how the courts respond to the arguments presented in this amicus brief and how the lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft unfolds. The outcome could have significant implications for the development of AI and the entertainment industry's ability to protect its intellectual property. Additionally, the involvement of high-profile backers like Cate Blanchett and other Hollywood stars could bring more attention to the issue, potentially galvanizing support for stronger regulations and safeguards to protect creatives' rights in the age of AI.

Originally reported by variety.com. SerbNews adds analysis for culture, style & media readers.